Torq AI SOC Platform v Vega: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?
SHORT ANSWER
Torq AI SOC Platform scores higher overall on our weights, 7.20 to 5.65. Torq scores higher on Autonomy you can dial, Reaches your data sources, Hosting and data handling and Brings SOAR playbooks along; Vega scores higher on Shows its reasoning; they tie on Investigates end to end and Pricing clarity. Every score has a reason in the table below.
By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14
Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Vega autonomy ladder. TRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Documented; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Not documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: Not documented.
Best for: Detection-led teams that want autonomous triage with readable queries, and keep response with analysts
Torq: Presents oversight and control as core, with governance and audit logs on workflows; a named approval mode is not described on the pages reviewed.
Vega: Verdicts come with prioritised next actions, such as isolating a host or rotating keys, for analysts to carry out; Vega does not state that it executes response, so there is no autonomy to set.
Vega: Each conclusion shows the Vega KQL query behind it, each alert is marked escalated or not with its reasoning, and every hunt step shows its work.
Vega: Data stays where it lives (no migration, ingestion or egress, Vega says); hosting options, tenancy, residency and attestations are not described.
HOSTING SaaS on Vega's Security Analytics Mesh; Vega says no migration, ingestion or egress. Tenancy, residency and attestations: Not published.
Which should a lean team choose?
Choose Torq if
it matters most that it reaches your data sources (9/10)
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
Choose Torq if you have many tools to connect and want fixed automations and AI agents in one product, built from plain-language descriptions. Look elsewhere first if you need named approval modes per action or published prices.
Choose Vega if
it matters most that it shows its reasoning (9/10)
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
Choose Vega if your team is detection-led and wants autonomous triage whose every conclusion can be checked against the query behind it. Look elsewhere first if you want the platform to carry out response actions, or need published connectors, hosting details or pricing.
Frequently asked questions
Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Torq or Vega?
Torq on our autonomy criterion (Torq 8/10, Vega 4/10). Torq: Presents oversight and control as core, with governance and audit logs on workflows; a named approval mode is not described on the pages reviewed. Vega: Verdicts come with prioritised next actions, such as isolating a host or rotating keys, for analysts to carry out; Vega does not state that it executes response, so there is no autonomy to set.
Can Torq or Vega act without a person?
Torq does not document actions on sign-off natively, and documents unattended actions within limits: Autonomous remediation through Hyperautomation workflows. Vega does not document actions on sign-off natively, and No autonomous response described. Rungs documented: Torq 4 of 5, Vega 3 of 5.
Which is easier to price, Torq or Vega?
Torq: Not published. Vega: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Torq 2/10, Vega 2/10.