Exaforce v Prophet Security: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?
SHORT ANSWER
Prophet Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.30 to 6.90. Exaforce scores higher on Brings SOAR playbooks along and Pricing clarity; Prophet scores higher on Shows its reasoning and Hosting and data handling; they tie on Investigates end to end, Autonomy you can dial and Reaches your data sources. Every score has a reason in the table below.
By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14
Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.
Exaforce and Prophet: score per criterion; open Why for both reasons and sources
Criterion
Exaforce
Prophet
Higher
Investigates end to end 20%Why
Exaforce: Exabots handle detection, triage, investigation and response on a unified data layer and knowledge graph, with separate models for data relationships, anomaly detection and reasoning.
Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.
Exaforce: Response actions carry full audit trails, but how the reasoning behind a verdict is shown to analysts is not described on the pages reviewed.
Exaforce: 130+ integrations across IaaS, SaaS, identity, endpoint, SIEM, SOAR, email, ticketing and threat intel; it says it ingests logs, alerts and telemetry from over 100 sources.
Exaforce: Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer; tenancy, key control, residency and security attestations are not described on the pages reviewed.
Prophet: Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key; SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023; AWS processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; deletion on exit listed, retention period not stated.
Exaforce: Out-of-the-box playbooks plus new ones built in natural language, in a visual editor mixing deterministic and agentic steps; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.
Prophet: No price; the pricing address returned not found, a free proof of value is offered, and its AWS Marketplace listing refers buyers to Prophet's site.
A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.
Documented by Exaforce only: none. Documented by Prophet only: show work and act alone, within limits. Documented by both: triage, investigate and act on sign-off.
A partial rung counts as not documented in these sentences.
What do they cost, and where do they run?
Exaforce
Not published
No pricing page. AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract; the unit is not defined.
HOSTING SaaS. Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer. Tenancy, key control, residency and attestations: Not published on the pages reviewed.
Prophet
Not published
No price published; the /pricing address returned not found. A free proof of value is offered.
HOSTING Dedicated single-tenant with bring-your-own-key option; infrastructure on AWS with processing in the United States, Germany, Switzerland or Japan; Amazon Bedrock and Anthropic listed as AI subprocessors. On-premises: Not published. SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
Which should a lean team choose?
Choose Exaforce if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)
Choose Exaforce if you want native response across cloud, identity and email behind approval gates, or want the option of having Exaforce run the platform for you. Look elsewhere first if you need to see how each verdict was reached, or need published hosting and attestation details.
Choose Prophet if
it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)
Choose Prophet Security if you want native response with explicit sign-off, single-tenant hosting with your own keys, or a human review service at night. Look elsewhere first if you want existing SOAR playbooks translated or a published price.
Frequently asked questions
Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Exaforce or Prophet?
Neither: they tie on our autonomy criterion (Exaforce 8/10, Prophet 8/10). Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described. Prophet: Scoped Agent Actions run autonomously or with your sign-off, and Watchtower adds a 24x7 human review service.
Can Exaforce or Prophet act without a person?
Exaforce documents actions on sign-off, and Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described. Prophet documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Agent Actions can run autonomously within their scope. Rungs documented: Exaforce 4 of 5, Prophet 5 of 5.
Which is easier to price, Exaforce or Prophet?
Exaforce: Not published. Prophet: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Exaforce 4/10, Prophet 3/10.