Skip to content
AI SOC Compared

PAIR PAGE

Artemis Security v Exaforce: which AI SOC can a lean team hand more to?

SHORT ANSWER

Artemis Security scores higher overall on our weights, 7.15 to 6.90. Artemis scores higher on Autonomy you can dial, Shows its reasoning and Hosting and data handling; Exaforce scores higher on Pricing clarity; they tie on Investigates end to end, Reaches your data sources and Brings SOAR playbooks along. Every score has a reason in the table below.

By The Alert Desk · AI SOC Compared · Published 2026-09-27 · Updated 2026-10-14

Desk research from public vendor pages; vendor facts read 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026; published 27 September 2026, updated 14 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.

Artemis Security

Rank 4 of 10

Artemis Security autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: DocumentedTISALArtemis Security autonomy ladder. TRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: Documented.

Best for: Teams that want to pre-authorise response per action and per connector, with an AI-native SOAR beside it

Read the Artemis profile

Exaforce

Rank 7 of 10

Exaforce autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: PartialTISALExaforce autonomy ladder. TRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: Partial.

Best for: Teams that want native response across cloud, identity and email, run by their own staff or as an Exaforce-managed service

Read the Exaforce profile

Which platform scores higher on each criterion?

Artemis and Exaforce: score per criterion; open Why for both reasons and sources
CriterionArtemisExaforceHigher
Investigates end to end 20%
Why

Artemis: Correlates identity, cloud, endpoint and SaaS data against a living model of the environment and investigates autonomously; its Cursor case cites 96% of investigations resolved autonomously (Artemis's figure).

Source: Artemis Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: Exabots handle detection, triage, investigation and response on a unified data layer and knowledge graph, with separate models for data relationships, anomaly detection and reasoning.

Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

8 / 108 / 10Tie
Autonomy you can dial 20%
Why

Artemis: Acts alone only where you have pre-authorised it, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail.

Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

9 / 108 / 10Artemis
Shows its reasoning 15%
Why

Artemis: Investigations and each proposed action come with evidence and an impact preview; step-level agent reasoning is described less specifically than at the leaders.

Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: Response actions carry full audit trails, but how the reasoning behind a verdict is shown to analysts is not described on the pages reviewed.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

7 / 106 / 10Artemis
Reaches your data sources 15%
Why

Artemis: 225+ connectors, ingesting SIEMs such as Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel and CrowdStrike NG-SIEM and querying stores such as Snowflake, BigQuery and AWS Security Lake in place.

Source: Artemis Security connectors · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: 130+ integrations across IaaS, SaaS, identity, endpoint, SIEM, SOAR, email, ticketing and threat intel; it says it ingests logs, alerts and telemetry from over 100 sources.

Source: Exaforce integrations · Read 13 Oct 2026

8 / 108 / 10Tie
Hosting and data handling 10%
Why

Artemis: Ingests hot-path data and queries high-volume data where it lives, and describes on-premises execution of response; tenancy, residency and attestations are not described.

Source: Artemis Security platform overview · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer; tenancy, key control, residency and security attestations are not described on the pages reviewed.

Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

5 / 104 / 10Artemis
Brings SOAR playbooks along 10%
Why

Artemis: An AI-native SOAR builder aimed at teams maintaining a SOAR, with 300+ actions, a Splunk SOAR connector and automatic proposals for playbook updates; playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.

Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: Out-of-the-box playbooks plus new ones built in natural language, in a visual editor mixing deterministic and agentic steps; existing playbooks are rebuilt rather than translated.

Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

8 / 108 / 10Tie
Pricing clarity 10%
Why

Artemis: No pricing page; Book a Demo only.

Source: Artemis Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

Exaforce: No pricing page; AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract, without a defined unit.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Exaforce Agentic SOC Starter Pack · Read 13 Oct 2026

2 / 104 / 10Exaforce

How far does each go without a person?

Artemis

Artemis Security autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: DocumentedTRIAGEDOCINVESTIGATEDOCSHOW WORKPARTACT ON SIGN-OFFDOCACT ALONE,WITHIN LIMITSDOC
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: in general terms only, or through another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
  1. TRIAGEDocumented

    Every alert investigated 24/7 in its Cursor case.

    Source: Artemis Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  2. INVESTIGATEDocumented

    Autonomous investigation across identity, cloud, endpoint and SaaS.

    Source: Artemis Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  3. SHOW WORKPartial

    Evidence and an impact preview per action; step-level reasoning not described.

    Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

  4. ACT ON SIGN-OFFDocumented

    Approval set per action and per connector.

    Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

  5. ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITSDocumented

    Acts alone only where pre-authorised, reversible by design.

    Source: Artemis Security response · Read 13 Oct 2026

A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.

Exaforce

Exaforce autonomy ladderTRIAGE: Documented; INVESTIGATE: Documented; SHOW WORK: Partial; ACT ON SIGN-OFF: Documented; ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITS: PartialTRIAGEDOCINVESTIGATEDOCSHOW WORKPARTACT ON SIGN-OFFDOCACT ALONE,WITHIN LIMITSPART
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: in general terms only, or through another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
  1. TRIAGEDocumented

    Exabots triage alerts and escalate only what needs human judgment.

    Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  2. INVESTIGATEDocumented

    Exabots investigate on the unified data layer and knowledge graph.

    Source: Exaforce homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

  3. SHOW WORKPartial

    Actions carry audit trails; verdict reasoning shown to analysts is not described.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

  4. ACT ON SIGN-OFFDocumented

    Approval gates and Slack confirmations from users or managers.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

  5. ACT ALONE, WITHIN LIMITSPartial

    Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described.

    Source: Exaforce Exabot Respond · Read 13 Oct 2026

A filled rung means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works in your environment.

Documented by Artemis only: act alone, within limits. Documented by Exaforce only: none. Documented by both: triage, investigate and act on sign-off.

A partial rung counts as not documented in these sentences.

What do they cost, and where do they run?

Artemis

Not published

No pricing page; Book a Demo only.

Source: Artemis Security homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

HOSTING SaaS; hot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy, residency and attestations: Not published.

Exaforce

Not published

No pricing page. AWS Marketplace lists an Agentic SOC Starter Pack at $75,000 per 12-month contract; the unit is not defined.

Source: AWS Marketplace: Exaforce Agentic SOC Starter Pack · Read 13 Oct 2026

HOSTING SaaS. Stores and normalises raw data in its own data layer. Tenancy, key control, residency and attestations: Not published on the pages reviewed.

Which should a lean team choose?

Choose Artemis if

  • it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (9/10)
  • it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)

Choose Artemis Security if you want to decide action by action and connector by connector what may run unattended, or if you maintain a SOAR and want an AI-native builder beside it. Look elsewhere first if you need published pricing or hosting details, or a vendor with a longer track record.

Choose Exaforce if

  • it matters most that it investigates end to end (8/10)
  • it matters most that it autonomy you can dial (8/10)

Choose Exaforce if you want native response across cloud, identity and email behind approval gates, or want the option of having Exaforce run the platform for you. Look elsewhere first if you need to see how each verdict was reached, or need published hosting and attestation details.

Frequently asked questions

Which gives a team more control over autonomy, Artemis or Exaforce?

Artemis on our autonomy criterion (Artemis 9/10, Exaforce 8/10). Artemis: Acts alone only where you have pre-authorised it, with approval set per action and per connector, impact-checked containment that is reversible by design, and a who, what and why audit trail. Exaforce: Approval gates, full audit trails and Slack confirmations from users or managers, with actions described as approved and reversible; named autonomy levels per category are not described.

Can Artemis or Exaforce act without a person?

Artemis documents actions on sign-off, and documents unattended actions within limits: Acts alone only where pre-authorised, reversible by design. Exaforce documents actions on sign-off, and Exabots execute response; per-category autonomy settings and a way to pull autonomy back are not described. Rungs documented: Artemis 4.5 of 5, Exaforce 4 of 5.

Which is easier to price, Artemis or Exaforce?

Artemis: Not published. Exaforce: Not published. Pricing clarity scores: Artemis 2/10, Exaforce 4/10.